Getting right to it, because this will be a very long read: Out of all the tablet-reader comparisons I saw, geek com's is the most comprehensive while keeping it simple. I recommend a read of that one, to begin, for the specs involved and clear descriptions of what these two devices can and can't do, though it's not as detailed as some articles.
I've included, below, links to other articles that also offer more than the usual pure typing of hardware specs without context.
First, a superficial thought: I own and enjoy (and showed off the other night) my year-old NookColor, the one with the single-core processor, which won't be able to do Netflix as the two new small tablet-readers will be able to, but the older NookColor has color against a black bezel, a favorite combo because it throws the attention on the colored content. Why did B&N make only a beige bordered tablet?
And, a caution: I posted on a forum last night that B&N quietly re-partitioned any NookColors sold from May 2011 on, to change the model's internal structure so that instead of having 4-5 gigs available for our personal books downloaded elsewhere, along with Nook books, NookColor owners are now alloted only 1 gig for side-loaded content. How will that work for movie files we sideload?
UPDATE-1, on NOOK Tablet partitioning
(Original posting Nov. 8, Updated Nov. 9 to add sourcing info)
The change B&N made in internal partitioning for the NookColor (the need to reserve space for a good number of apps and for BN-purchased material) wouldn't be suddenly set-aside for the Nook Tablet. The information I mentioned comes from B&N's own Nook-comparison webpage, in Footnote 6 for the Nook Tablet, which is the same as the definitely-applied Footnote 5 info for the Nook Color, except for the amount of available internal storage.
Below is what B&N itself says in VERY light gray text at the bottom of the comparison box on their own Nook model comparison web page
Under "Memory" box, they have a Footnote 6 for the Nook Tablet, and that footnote 6 says:
" 1GB = 1 billion bytes. Actual formatted capacity may be less. Approximately 13GB available to store content, of which up to 12GB may be reserved for content purchased from the Barnes & Noble NOOK Store. "Now, what they did do for the Nook Color tablet-reader models as of May 2011 WAS exactly to reserve 5 of 6 gigabytes of available content-storage space, for B&N-purchased material, leaving the noted 1 gigabyte for personal files not purchased from B&N. The same wording is used for the Nook Tablet.
Playing side-loaded video off the SD Card
What will video performance be like if played off an SD card instead and what's the best class and compatible, reliable brand of microSD card to get for that? I was surprised to see the AmazonBasics 16 GB microSDHC Class 10 mem card get so many good reviews with hardly any bad ones, unusual for that type of card.
Am adding a basic-info page for finding suitable SD cards for a device.
More perplexing for me, the Nook books are now kept in the same partition as system files and apps and can't be seen by file managers. I personally prefer to be able to see and work with files I've purchased. Now they're hidden from us. Why? Some think it's because B&N's digital-rights-management (DRM) method is just the credit card # used (these expire) and that owners merely need to copy a file and give friends the old credit card #. So, now these files can't be seen. At least not by normal methods. B&N's head man stressed their 'Openness' today. Hmmm.
The hardware specs
. The new Nook [Color] Tablet has 16 gigs of built-in storage vs Kindle Fire's 8 gigs. The screen technology and resolution are the same although B&N say their anti-glare protection (w/lamination) is better. B&N claims the Nook Tablet will have up to 11.5 hours of battery life, compared with 8 hours for the Kindle Fire. While I'm a paying, card-carrying B&N member, with a NookColor I use daily, I've not had the best experience with some of their claims on their comparison sheets or from staff in the stores.
. The Nook Tablet has 1 gig of RAM while the Kindle Fire's has 512 megs of RAM (but note what geek.com, linked above, and other articles linked below say about what that may mean as well, and the Kindle also uses the Amazon cloud for both storage and streaming.
. B&N doesn't offer its own streaming but it has the separate SD slot that can hold up to 32 gigs of storage, and any DRM-free MP4 from a DVD transferred to that can be ported to the tablet if it was purchased from B&N (which would allow it to be put into the larger partition). Otherwise it's not very likely to fit into the 1-gig sideloaded-files area, unless it's just a trailer.
Kindle users would be able to transfer to the Kindle Fire's internal storage video, files from their computer or from their Cloud storage area on the Amazon server (but they can also just stream one from Amazon). How much could be kept in the internal storage space depends on the amount of compression used. Amazon's estimates have seemed a bit overoptimistic. For more Q&A on the Kindle Fire itself, see one with an Amazon VP.
A few things to remember here:
a. Amazon offers free storage, unlimited, on your own Amazon server area (Cloud) for any music or videos that you purchase from Amazon. These files never count against any storage limits on the (server) Cloud.
b. Amazon also offers 5 free gigs of Amazon Cloud storage space (globally) for data or media files customers get from anywhere else. (Tip: If paying $20/yr for 20 gigs, you can also upload ALL your music files, no matter where you got them, w/o their counting against the 20 gigs and stream them also.)
c. They additionally offer 5 free gigs of Kindle Cloud storage space for your personal docs and non-DRM'd books from elsewhere, which can be read on your Kindle Fire and the e-Ink readers.
Kindle books are kept in your Kindle Library on the server, ready for no-cost re-download at any time.
All of the files above can be downloaded to your Kindle Fire at any time but you have to make sure there's room for them by deleting unnecessary files; however, those files -- whether bought from Amazon or elsewhere -- could also always be available on one of your free Cloud spaces described above.
d. Amazon streams your music or video for you on demand, but of course you have to be connected to the Net for that, which B&N stressed a lot during the announcements. On the other hand, they stressed customers could stream from partners Netflix and Hulu, which also requires connection to the Net.
B&N announced they're also giving free storage for purchased media files but can't stream them to the customer..
They're not giving free storage for Non-B&N-purchased files though. They termed their offerings "more open" than Amazon's in that B&N doesn't have you stream THEIR files but instead sends you to Netflix or Hulu to get the streams via subscriptions to their partners' offerings.
This unusual definition of 'openness" would apply to Amazon also, as they've already announced several times (per Peter Kafka) that Netflix, Pandora, Facebook and Twitter should have apps ready for the Kindle Fire by launch. Amazon doesn't, however, say a thing about Hulu, but then they've been serious bidders there, so that's another matter.
UPDATE-2: On November 11, Amazon announced they're adding Hulu Plus and ESPN in the following week. Well, that's pretty huge.
e. For those who already have Amazon PRIME, it was for some time a program that provides free 2-day shipping on all items sold by Amazon and on many products that are sold by 3rd party sellers. This had been reason enough for many of us to pay about $6.58/mo. ($79/yr).
In the past year, though, they've added to the Prime program almost 13,000 (often older) streaming videos at no added cost to the Prime member (up to 2 videos can be streamed at one time) and recently the ability to borrow a Kindle book, including 100 current and former NY Times bestsellers, once a month with no due-date and no waiting -- also at no added charge.
I've seen that news sites and comment-area posts confuse the Prime Lending feature with the Kindle personal lending feature, which B&N also has and which is publisher-controlled. Both companies have public library lending now, also, with Amazon's by air-delivery via WiFi, unusually simple and smooth.
AllThingsD and Peter Kafka
Allthingsd has an article by analyst Peter Kafka, titled "The Nook Doesn't Need the Cloud. The Nook Needs the Cloud. Discuss, which I had heard he was writing, when I watched a video interview at Wall St. Journal, which I've partially transcribed way below.
In the linked article, Kafka is a bit peeved by B&N's presentation of what will be done or not and explains his reactions.
In his live blogging of the announcements, he makes sport of B&N's repeated statements that had been jabs at Amazon's offerings, paraphrasing them:
"But let’s remind you that many Cloud services are unreliable. Except for ours, of course. So: Cloud is not important except we have a Cloud except Clouds are often not great."
The live blogging is irreverent and some didn't appreciate that.
In the discussion column, Kafka points out:
' In order to move movies and TV shows on the gadget, for instance, you wouldn’t be able to use any digital video you bought from Amazon or Apple. Instead you’d have to get your hands on unencrypted MP4 video files, or something similar... 'Also, there's that 1 gig limit for the side-loaded material from non-B&N sources.
Excerpts from the article.
Re the Differences that add up:
"The wider gaps are on the inside; the Nook Tablet sports 16GB of storage and 1GB of RAM, compared to 8GB of storage compared 512MB of RAM on the Kindle Fire. And when you compare the two on specs alone, it's no small temptation to think that Amazon is outclassed. Amazon, though, holds most of your goodies in its cloud for you. That's potentially inconvenient for long, Wi-Fi-less trips, but the gap should be immaterial around the house, etc.
"As for RAM, that can be a bit misleading as well; the iPad 2 and iPhone 4S seem to get along just fine with 512MB, while there are 1GB Android phones and tablets that can get burpy...
"In action today, the Nook Tablet's performance wasn't entirely promising. The custom built UI was noticeably sluggish, as was the web browser. On the plus side, the media apps ran smoothly. Our first look at the Kindle Fire, on the other hand, revealed shockingly fast and fluid performance even though it's got weaker specs on paper.
The Amazon Kindle appears to be built on cheaper hardware but incorporates technologies like Amazon's Silk web browser to help the product run like a much stronger machine."
Nook's claim to better battery life appears to give them the edge on that, Gizmodo says, but most of the gadget sites want to test these soon. Gizmodo's summary: "But the little differences add up—and maybe not to fifty bucks."
WALL STREET JOURNAL
Sidenote: As the AP story at WSJ explains, announcements also included reductions in price on other Nook models:
"The book seller cut the prices on its existing e-readers. The Nook Color is now $199, down from $239, and the Nook Simple Touch black-and-white reader, which has no browser, is now $99, down from $139."
It's one of the few articles pointing out the lack of web browser for the Nook touch (if comparing it to the Kindle Touch) and it also lacks audio, music, and text-to-speech. Images in books (such as maps with small text detail or photos) can be zoomed to full screen on the Kindle but can't be zoomed at all on the Nook Touch.
While many want only to read their books, the $99 is not really for an equivalent feature-set. B&N mentions they don't subject you to ads, but the bottom 3rd of the Nook Touch Home screen consists of ads for books you might like in the future. Bookstores often get wrong what I'd like to read and I'd not want to see some of those on my Home screen. But the Nook, otherwise, has a really clean look.
WSJ video interview with AllThingsDigital's Peter Kafka:
Peter Kafka gets around and is interviewed in the WSJ video here. He explains that B&N's "Cloud" "won't be anything like" Amazon's Cloud and that the hardware differences probably won't mean that much, based on the exchanges during the Q&A, to general-interest consumers.
Kafka and colleages say that Amazon's cloud IS important because of the content you can access with it, in that "Amazon has built this cloud service that's meant to sort of take media that you own, move it up to their Internet servers and let you access it when you want" and that's working right now mostly with music but eventually with video as well but that Barnes and Noble doesn't have that."
He says that "In the end, if you want to use the Barnes and Noble Nook Tablet to watch movies or to listen to music, the reality is you're going to actually have to use the cloud service...you're going to have to have access to the Internet." [I'm not sure why they couldn't play B&N movies locally though, since there'd be room for that in the larger partition.]
B&N's focus will remain on customers buying stuff "that you read" but if you want to watch movies or listen to music, they're "happy to send you to Netflix or Hulu or Pandora..."
Kafka said he plans to write about B&N's "playing up the fact that they've got more storage capability with the machine so that you can watch five HD movies, but there's no practical way to store five HD movies on this machine. He thinks "they're going to get beat up a little bit for this because they're saying you can store stuff on this machine and yet real users in real terms -- it's going to be very hard to actually move media on the machine -- it's really a training [?] device."
WSJ's Jeffrey A. Trachtenberg and John Kell write that Michael Gartenberg, an analyst with technology research firm Gartner, said [in a now recurring theme], "But this isn't about hardware, it's about content and services."
The SF Weekly's Dan Mitchell quotes B&N: "The Kindle Fire -- and they do a lot of things well -- is a vending machine for Amazon services"
' He presented that as a drawback. But the sad fact for B&N is that people really, really like Amazon services. The fact that the Fire is a vending machine for those services is a feature, not a bug. It's the reason Amazon invented the thing, and it's a reason many people will buy it...
Lynch played up the fact that buyers can take their Nooks to any Barnes & Noble outlet for repairs. Which is fine, I guess, but who wants to hear about how the product they're being asked to buy is going to need repairs?'
More seriously, my B&N is only 10 blocks from my home, but staff there isn't usually trained in the fine details of the Nook devices. I had one very good experience there when one helper threw up his hands, at a problem I was having but left his shift and the next person was able to go to the server and solve the in-store problem with accessing their network. It's a nice feature they have of our being able to read an e-book there for an hour before we decide whether we want to buy it. I've been able to compare a few e-books that way, against the hard copies too.
CNet's Donald Bell writes (showing how widespread the take on Amazon's whole-system strength):
"When you add up all the e-books, apps, music, games, and videos, there's no question that Amazon has more of its own content offerings to dive into. Its cloud technology infrastructure also happens to be one of the most robust systems in the industry, and its tablet reaps the rewards in terms of improved Web browsing performance, media lockers like Cloud Player, and Cloud Drive file backup."
AND LAST magazine cited, ZDNet's Jason Perlow weighs in
The article by ZDNet's Perlow is the least positive about the Nook Tablet.
He considers the Nook Color "excellent" and lists its many good points but is more focused on how this "never really translated into drastically improved sales." In fact, I have seen many news articles written as if the NookColor was not the first one out with a 7" tablet priced very nicely.
He feels it'll "have a very difficult time matching the same value proposition Amazon offers" (due to that ecosystem described over and over again). He doesn't believe that B&N can provide the full range of services and maybe more importantly, he points out that they may not have "the ability to absorb the up front costs of selling tablet devices at [almost] a loss in order to monetize additional services. Even partnering with Netflix or even Hulu, he says they'll "have tremendous difficulty in being able to match overall value" against Amazon's aggressive competition, "which doesn't have the additional burden of having to maintain a large retail presence that Barnes & Noble does with its 1700+ stores.
His final sentence (pun intended) in the article is stark. But then I remember he once carried an image on his page of the Kindle tombstone, "Died 2010," so I think he may be too pessimistic about B&N Nook's chances in the same way.
Personal note on this
Although my NookColor has just a single-core processor, it reads ePub books directly and has been fun for me to use (if a bit oversensitive in the keyboard!), I'll probably keep that rather than upgrade, since I'll also be getting the Kindle Fire for the Amazon media bonuses and the Cloud's (Silk) browser speedup plus the 5 free gigs of Amazon cloud (for any type of file, with ALL Amazon-purchased files getting free and unliited storage)) and 5 free gigs of Kindle Cloud (for personal documents), and of course Prime's add-on features of Kindle-book lending described recently. I think they're right that the combo of what's available for the device is hard to beat.
But I'm pretty sure MOST people will find themselves really happy with either of these tablet-readers, and it's just a matter of which factors are more important to us.
FINAL, SURPRISING ITEM
A Rooted Kindle Fire ??
Here is what was said by an Amazon official, reported by PC Magazine's Sascha Segan on Sept. 28, 2011, during new-Kindles launch day in an article titled "Amazon: The Kindle Fire Will Get Rooted." As written:
' Amazon's new Kindle Fire tablet has a great user interface, but many of our readers already want to get rid of it. That's OK. Amazon isn't doing anything special to prevent techies from "rooting" and rewriting the software on its powerful yet inexpensive new tablet, Jon Jenkins, director of Amazon's Silk browser project said.
"It's going to get rooted, and what you do after you root it is up to you," Jenkins said.
... The company won't help hackers root the tablet, it just isn't actively trying to stop them.
[Segan added, in his own words], "The tablet has a USB port and mass storage mode, so you can also sideload Android APK program files, even without rooting it. That will be one way to get apps not available in Amazon's Appstore onto the Fire." '
I wouldn't count on the mass storage mode, but it gives hope.
Kindle Touch 3G Kindle Touch WiFi Kindle Basic (UK: KBasic) Kindle Fire
Kindle Keybd 3G (UK: Kindle Keybd 3G) K3 Special Offers K3-3G Special Offers DX
Check often: Temporarily-free late-listed non-classics or recently published ones
Guide to finding Free Kindle books and Sources. Top 100 free bestsellers. Liked-books under $1
UK-Only: recently published non-classics, bestsellers, or £5 Max ones
Also, UK customers should see the UK store's Top 100 free bestsellers.
*Click* to Return to the HOME PAGE. Or click on the web browser's BACK button Below are ways to Share this post if you'd like others to see it.
-- The Send to Kindle button works well only on Firefox currently.
(Older posts have older Kindle model info. For latest models, see CURRENT KINDLES page. )
If interested, you can also follow my add'l blog-related news at Facebook and Twitter
Questions & feedback are welcome in the Comment areas (tho' spam is deleted). Thanks!